English Abstract
Abstract :
The right to question is one of the most prestigious and oldest tools of parliamentary oversight, it is most common tools and widely used to control the acts of the executive authority we dealt with the parliamentary question in several aspects by research and analysis with the activation of the comparison in countries of the study in Bahrain Kuwait, the UAE, Jordan and Morocco.
The study is divided into a preliminary research and five chapters, that by focusing light on the concept of parliamentary oversight, tools and the importance of censorship in general and its desired goals.
We dealt in the first chapter with the nature of the right to question and the legislative and jurisprudential definitions of the parliamentary question and its origins and its importance, while in the second chapter we dealt with the formal and the substantive conditions of the parliamentary question and we concluded that if the conditions stipulated in the right to question are not available, so the situations of the parliaments varied between keeping the question, refusing or reject, though all lead to exclude the question.
In the third chapter we dealt with the types of parliamentary question like written, oral and urgent question, and finished to illustrate the importance of the urgent questions in Moroccan parliament and the recommendation to circulate them.
In the fourth chapter, procedural provisions of the parliamentary question were discussed and were divided to: procedures of asking and procedures of answering. Despite there are rules and procedures governing the provision of parliamentary question and answering it, however, in the parliaments of Bahrain, Kuwait and the UAE they exclude the questions raised during the discussion of the budget or any other matter included on the Council from the procedure of the question registration in the agenda.
And finally in the fifth chapter we dealt with the implications of the parliamentary question asking whether by answering it or convert it to an interrogation or casuals of the question that may arise on the question like question canceling or waive.
The study is concluded by findings and recommendations, which focused on the aspects of criticism in the abuse of parliaments in the countries under study for the right to parliamentary question, considering the features that accompany each internal system in these parliaments and the recommendation to circulate them to other systems.
